Closed captioned livestreams and replays of all City of Cocoa City Council meetings can be found on the City's YouTube Channel. Simply click on the "CC" in the bottom right corner of the video.

File #: 24-599    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Informational Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/4/2024 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/12/2024 Final action:
Title: To Provide Direction to Staff for Funding and New Policies, if Necessary, for the Indian River Drive Septic to Sewer Conversion.
Attachments: 1. HB1379FAQs.pdf, 2. Clerk Memo REVISED F1 SOIRL Contingency Fund Request City of Cocoa 545373 Zones J-K Septic to Sewer (003).pdf, 3. SOIRL Funding Request(Revised).pdf, 4. SOIRL Cost analysis and impact 11.29.2022a.pdf, 5. SOIRL Cost analysis and impact 11.29.2022.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

 

Memo Date:                                          October 4, 2024

Agenda Date:                     October 8, 2024

Prepared By:                                          Jack Walsh, Utilities Director; Stockton Whitten, City Manager

Through:                                          Councilwoman Weeks, District 3

Requested Action:                     

title

To Provide Direction to Staff for Funding and New Policies, if Necessary, for the Indian River Drive Septic to Sewer Conversion.

End

 

body

BACKGROUND:

 

Councilwoman Weeks requested the placement of this item/subject on the October 24, 2024 agenda. This agenda item and/or subject was previously reviewed by Council on May 24, July 26, August 9, November 29, 2022, May 23, 2023, January 23, 2024, and July 23, 2024.

 

Two areas within the City of Cocoa along Indian River Drive have been identified for funding from the Save Our Indian River Lagoon (SOIRL) tax adopted by Brevard County. The areas are known as Area “J” and “K” and consist of a total of 88 single family homes that can be elgible for reimbursement to remove their septic systems and replaced with a city owned gravity sewer system.

 

The SOIRL study conducted by Tetra Tech identified 5 major areas of pollutents into the Indian River Lagoon;

 

1.                     Stormwater runoff

2.                     Baseflow/septic, leaking sewer, reclaimed water

3.                     Atmospheric deposition

4.                     Point sources

5.                     Muck flux

 

 

SOIRL currently has approved an allocation of approximately $6.1M for 88 lots toward the design, construction of a new gravity sewer system to eliminate existing septic systems assuming 100% participation.  That amount is reduced by $545,373 if no additional match funding is received by October 25, 2024. Therefore the total would be $5,467,559. The final design and plans are complete.  The opinion of probable costs was prepared by the Engineer of Record and the costs vary based on the method of construction used by a contractor to install the sewer mains. The last cost estimates place the costs of construction of the new gravity system at $6.6 to $8.2M.  This estimate does not inlcude homeowner on site costs.

 

Cocoa engaged a consultant to prepare a preliminary feasibility study to identify more specifically how many homes could be served, if a gravity or pressure force main system would be required and to understand the geology, and the challenges of construction in this area. 

 

 

Staff has previously advised that the cost for the project using SOIRL funding along with potential grants could potentially cover all costs based on current budgets assuming 100% participation of the 88 lot owners.  However, cost over runs could range from $691K to $4.9M depending on the actual connections achieved. Note as the level of participation decreases, the costs to the city or citizens increase.  For example, at 70% participation using the worst-case estimate, the city or citizens could be responsible for repaying an estimated $2.3M of reimbursable costs back to Brevard County. 

 

At the community meeting hosted by Staff and our consultant in November 2020, the project was presented as a potential no cost to the homeowners based on information known at the time.  Per our current discussion with Brevard County, the costs for the design and construction of the sewer system are reimbursable and the onsite costs of the homeowner are not reimbursable under the SOIRL program but may be eligible under other grants offered by FDEP or SJRWMD.  A survey was conducted in conjunction with the community meeting and of the 40 respondents, 22 homeowners or 55% were not supportive of the project if the homeowner was responsible for costs associated with connecting to the sewer system. 

 

Currently, City of Cocoa Code of Ordinances does not require existing homeowners who have functioning septic systems to connect to city sewer system. The following items are presented to outline options available to Council to consider.  The financial liabilities associated with this project will need to be addressed and the appropriate actions identified for follow up by staff.  To address the requirements to connect or not connect and to address shortfall in funding that is not covered by either the SOIRL funding for infrastructure or a future grant from FDEP/SJRWMD for homeowner costs, the following options are available:

 

Option 1:  Withdraw the sewer infrastructure project and let the homeowners submit and qualify for advanced septic treatment funding from SOIRL

 

If chosen, withdrawing the Septic to Sewer Conversion project will allow all homeowners within the current J and K areas to seek reimbursement for septic replacements if the new septic system meets all the advanced treatment requirements outlined in the SOIRL technical report.  Brevard County Natural Resources Department will require a letter from the city to withdraw the project.  Homeowners would be immediately eligible for to apply to Brevard County for individual septic system replacement dollars.  Per the SOIRL website, the maximum reimbursement for advanced septic systems is $18,000 per lot.  This option allows the greatest freedom of choice for homeowners but not complete removal of unwanted nutrients to the lagoon.

 

Option 2: Mandatory Participation.  Require all homeowners to connect to the sewer system once completed.  Council must determine how cost overruns are funded If cost overruns (if they occur) for public infrastructure are greater than SOIRL funding and any applicable grants, the cost above the available funding will be paid for by:                       

 

A) Utilities/Utility Rate Payers or

B) Homeowners

 

Each homeowner can apply for FDEP or SJRWMD grants through the city as available for additional reimbursements for septic abandonment, new sewer service line, hardscape replacements and potentially impact fee if allowed by the grant.

 

With mandatory participation, the city can apply for a grant from SJRWMD or FDEP for the short fall from SOIRL.  Adopting a specific mandatory connect policy for the homeowners in the affected areas as well as a policy for non-compliance with enforcement actions detailed is needed. The details on enforcement to address homeowners who refuse to comply will need to be identified. The policy must address the costs not covered due to refusal to participate and the costs above allocated funding regardless of the source of funding. 

 

In the above option, the cost overrun funding source for public infrastructure will need to be specifically stipulated as either a city utility responsibility or a homeowner responsibility.  Mandatory participation ensures maximum reimbursement from SOIRL funding but may be insufficient. Homeowners can seek grants for new service lines and other related costs.  If homeowners are to pay for infrastructure overruns, the estimated costs spread over 88 lots may create a large liability to the homeowners and that liability will vary on a lot-by-lot basis depending on actual costs associated with connecting a lot because of the varying lot characteristics and complexities (e.g., lot size and depth; obstructions such as walls, fences, trees, and accessory structures; location and accessibility of existing septic tank; length of lateral pipe run, etc.) related to installing a new lateral service line and removing the existing septic tank for each particular lot.  For example, based on a very preliminary field inspection of the 88 lots, the lots were placed into four, very general groupings to demonstrate the potential range of estimated costs to the homeowners from the lowest group estimate of $24,420 (18 lots) to the highest group estimate of $62,640 (4 lots) (see attached).  However, actual homeowner costs could be higher or lower for any particular lot depending on the characteristics and complexities of the lot as mentioned above.

 

To move forward with this project, homeowners will have to connect to the City’s sewer system.  As such, the City Council will need to adopt an ordinance requiring a citywide mandatory connection policy addressing lots that have existing septic when city sewer systems are or become available.  The areas identified as Area J and Area K from the Brevard County Tetra Tech Report will be required to connect without exception due to the very close proximity of the homes to the lagoon and the environmental harm such as algae blooms and nutrient loading caused by the septic systems per the Tetra Tech report.  Other properties east of US 1 with existing working septic systems, which are not part of the Area J and Area K project and not currently eligible for the subject funding program currently under consideration in this agenda item, will likewise be required to connect at their own expense because of their proximity and potential environmental harm to the lagoon.  The ordinance will also adopt enforcement procedures to enforce the mandatory sewer connection requirement and discontinuance of the homeowner’s septic system.  The additional costs and impact on funding eligibility on the City and homeowners associated with enforcement is unknown at this time and will depend on the number of homeowners that refuse abide by the mandatory connection policy and connect and participate in the project.

 

Homes outside Area J and K and outside the areas designated in the Tetra Tech report that are located west of US 1and have working septic systems and currently have access to the city sewer system can be granted exceptions to connect to the City’s sewer system so long as their septic systems continue to function properly.  Staff estimates there are approximately 124 parcels within the city limits that have current water accounts and have access to existing sewer but have no current sewer account.  Exceptions approved for properties west of US1 would not force a customer to immediately connect to the City’s sewer system, but such properties will be required to connect once their septic system fails in the future.

 

The Utilities Department will need to cash fund the project subject to review and upon securing mandatory participation, sign a contract with Brevard County to accept the funding    reimbursement from SOIRL.

 

 

STRATEGIC PLAN CONNECTION: 

 

N/A

 

 

BUDGETARY IMPACT:

 

Budgeted                                                                                                                                                    N/A

If not budgeted, is amendment/transfer attached?                      N/A

 

 

PREVIOUS ACTION:

 

As previously advised this item and/or subject has been before the Council six times.

 

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

Recommendation

To Provide Direction to Staff for Funding and New Policies, if Necessary, for the Indian River Drive Septic to Sewer Conversion

 

The State Ethics Commission ruled that except for procedural or preliminary matters, Councilwoman Koss has a voting conflict of interest and cannot vote on making a final determination regarding the septic-to-sewer conversion project  that would involve such a conversion for her residence (including Option 1 and Option 2) because she would receive guaranteed funds (gains) from the City and would have a mandatory outlay of funds she would personally incur if the project were underfunded (losses), thus, incurring a special private gain or loss under the voting conflict statute. Thus, Councilwoman Koss will not be voting on making a final determination regarding the project.  The remaining four (4) members of Council will need to provide final direction at this time.